Add to Google Feeds
As I contend in a related blog entry, I do not believe that the arguments supporting legislation against the legal recognition of homosexual marriages in the United States are consistent with the letter or the spirit of the U.S. Constitution. The pragmatic arguments against homosexual marriages are weak at best (particularly considering the dismal divorce rate in heterosexual marriages) and fail to justify current and proposed legislation on their own, leaving only the religious arguments underlying them---arguments which, of course, cannot legally be used to justify an act of Congress. Consequently, the burden of proof in the debate on the legislation lies not on the proponents to demonstrate that same-sex marriages should be acceptable but on the opponents to demonstrate, without resorting to hackneyed pseudo-religious dogma, that same-sex marriages both are economically or otherwise quantitatively detrimental to the public interest, and lead to the violation of individual rights. Unless such a basis can be offered, I offer that the current "Defense of Marriage Act", the proposed "Marriage Protection Act", and the many state-level imitations thereof are in diametric contradiction to the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Unless otherwise noted, the legislation listed here prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriages.
NPR has organized the various states' legislation into a map that depicts the methods used to prohibit (or, in the few well-known cases, allow) LGBT from entering into marriage agreements: State By State: The Legal Battle Over Gay Marriage
I have tried to restrict the postings listed here to reasonable arguments on the issue, and will not list rhetoric that is intentionally inflammatory. This is not to say that some of the postings will not evoke an emotional reaction---rather that they will not substitute such a reaction for valid arguments. Outside the bipartisan arena of politicians, classifying people as either "for" or "against" gay marriage is rather arbitrary, and so I have chosen not to do so.
Comments
Post new comment